One page, every intent
Required, recommended, and exploratory content all competed for attention.
SAP SuccessFactors Learning is a comprehensive learning platform that empowers employees through upskilling and by staying compliant.
Goal of the project: The Learning Platform Reimagine Project is a multi-phase initiative. Our team's focus for Phase 1 was redesigning the Learning Homepage and setting the foundation.
My role:
| Owned | Co-led |
|---|---|
| End-to-end bookmarking from concept to launch | Homepage structure, information architecture, and interaction patterns |
Required, recommended, and exploratory content all competed for attention.
Learners couldn't tell what was relevant to them.
Nothing let a learner save something and return to it.
Renewal concerns, alternative-solution evaluation, revenue on the line.
Across compliance, discovery, and usability, the same problem kept resurfacing: users couldn't reach the right content with the effort the moment deserved, whether that was a compliance deadline, curiosity, or a quick login from a phone.
| Learner intention | Goal | Design implication |
|---|---|---|
| Have to learn | Complete required training | Immediate access, minimal friction |
| Need to learn | Close a skill gap | Structure and guidance |
| Want to learn | Explore by curiosity | Discovery and inspiration |
One feed couldn't serve all three. The hierarchy had to flex: urgent learning visible immediately, goal-driven learning guided, exploratory learning given room.
We visualized learners' journey, capturing their thoughts, emotions, and motivations.
The biggest opportunity was not adding more content. It was organizing the homepage around learner intent, then making priority, progress, and return paths unmistakable.
A starting point that reflects why I am here.
Required learning is hard to spot. Search, navigation, and recommendations do not consistently surface relevant content.
Create intent-based entry points and surface urgent or relevant learning immediately.
Enough context to make a confident choice.
Recommendations can feel irrelevant, course context is limited, and reaching content takes too many clicks.
Show clear metadata, reduce decision friction, and make saving available wherever discovery happens.
A clear order that respects urgency and available time.
Required, recommended, saved, and active learning compete equally. There is no dependable way to return.
Place required learning first, add Jump Back In, and give bookmarks a dedicated home.
A reliable experience wherever and whenever I learn.
Progress can be difficult to resume, mobile usability is weak, and access may depend on device or location.
Preserve progress, make continuation obvious, and deliver one accessible responsive experience.
Confidence that the work is complete and progress is visible.
Learning history and next steps are difficult to find, weakening the reason to return.
Confirm completion, make history accessible, and provide a meaningful next step.
| What we learned | Response | Trade-off |
|---|---|---|
| Overwhelmed by competing content | Stronger hierarchy, guided sections | Less flexibility for power users |
| Intentions varied significantly | Modules by learner need | Personalization ran on assumptions, not perfect data |
| No way to return to content | Bookmarking + saved section | Added system complexity |
| Many interconnected features | Prioritized, simplified IA | Not every feature could be prominent |
Tailoring the content to individual users' needs, interests and development.
Providing a clear and structured learning path, bringing order to chaos, and supporting users' goals.
Incorporating all relevant learning needs and features in one place, available all the time across all devices.
Inspiring repeat learning and leveraging existing learning habits.
01 ✕ High-densitySurfaced everything and recreated the cognitive load we were solving.
02 ✕ MinimalScanned easily, but discovery collapsed.
03 ✓ Modular, guidedRequired learning first, with room to resume, save, and discover.
I proposed a phased roadmap (MVP, mid-term, and long-term) so stakeholders could see what had to ship now versus later.
Through iterative stakeholder engagement, we refined our designs, culminating in positive feedback from design advisors. A notable example below was a session with 37 advisors, which validated our design direction.
The redesigned homepage moved from concept to measurable customer adoption, reaching millions of learners after its first release.
Equal-weight features made the page harder to read. Organizing around why someone showed up gave us real prioritization.
Planning held only in short bursts, sometimes just the next two days, with the roadmap staying something to revise rather than finish once. Progress came from designing inside that uncertainty, not waiting for it to resolve.
Shipping bookmarking and homepage meant convincing three PMs, three designers & engineering. The harder, unglamorous work was alignment, not the design itself, and it deserved to be planned for from day one.